<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Tells Marlborough BOS to NOT Take Action on Hodge Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/</link>
	<description>The will of the people is the only legitimate foundation of any government, and to protect its free expression should be our first object. -Jefferson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hjulstrom</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hjulstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-961</guid>
		<description>The DTC insert in the Rivereast accused Republicans of supporting cuts to a long list of Town services and education. 

Let’s set the record straight!

On June 3rd Marlborough’s Democrat First Selectman Bill Black made a presentation to the Board of Finance in which he said that “he feels that we need to control taxes and reduce both the school and the operations budgets so people can still afford to live in town”. 

See BOF meeting minutes:  http://www.marlboroughct.net/content/Minutes/2009/BOF060309.pdf.

In Mr. Black’s presentation he listed all of the items that the Democrats attribute to the Republican members of the Board of Finance.

First Selectman Black’s suggestions included:

•	Having NO lifeguards during the weekdays.
•	A 15% to 25% reduction in library hours.
•	Not replacing the retiring State Trooper.
•	Close the Transfer Station except for Saturday.
•	Reduce the Board of Education budget by up to $450,000!
•	Slash AHM from the school’s budget.
•	Cut the $1,000 grant to Fife and Drum.

Yes, these were all First Selectman Black’s suggestions!

Also keep in mind that at any given Board of Finance meeting there are only three voting Republicans out of six voting members. That means in order to pass any motion, there needs to be a 4-2 majority, which would have needed bipartisan support. Yes folks, that means that at least one Democrat would need to vote in support for any cut in order to pass a motion.

The DTC leadership likes to twist the facts in order to frighten the voters and to deflect blame away from their own First Selectman and their own Party. It is time for the taxpayers to realize who is out there looking out for their interests, and it is NOT First Selectman Bill Black nor is it Lauren Cragg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DTC insert in the Rivereast accused Republicans of supporting cuts to a long list of Town services and education. </p>
<p>Let’s set the record straight!</p>
<p>On June 3rd Marlborough’s Democrat First Selectman Bill Black made a presentation to the Board of Finance in which he said that “he feels that we need to control taxes and reduce both the school and the operations budgets so people can still afford to live in town”. </p>
<p>See BOF meeting minutes:  <a href="http://www.marlboroughct.net/content/Minutes/2009/BOF060309.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.marlboroughct.net/content/Minutes/2009/BOF060309.pdf</a>.</p>
<p>In Mr. Black’s presentation he listed all of the items that the Democrats attribute to the Republican members of the Board of Finance.</p>
<p>First Selectman Black’s suggestions included:</p>
<p>•	Having NO lifeguards during the weekdays.<br />
•	A 15% to 25% reduction in library hours.<br />
•	Not replacing the retiring State Trooper.<br />
•	Close the Transfer Station except for Saturday.<br />
•	Reduce the Board of Education budget by up to $450,000!<br />
•	Slash AHM from the school’s budget.<br />
•	Cut the $1,000 grant to Fife and Drum.</p>
<p>Yes, these were all First Selectman Black’s suggestions!</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that at any given Board of Finance meeting there are only three voting Republicans out of six voting members. That means in order to pass any motion, there needs to be a 4-2 majority, which would have needed bipartisan support. Yes folks, that means that at least one Democrat would need to vote in support for any cut in order to pass a motion.</p>
<p>The DTC leadership likes to twist the facts in order to frighten the voters and to deflect blame away from their own First Selectman and their own Party. It is time for the taxpayers to realize who is out there looking out for their interests, and it is NOT First Selectman Bill Black nor is it Lauren Cragg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marl06447</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Marl06447</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-957</guid>
		<description>Reality: Don&#039;t confuse Ken with me.

I brought up the multi-year 4% raises in this comment thread.  The BOE and BOS are Democrat control boards.  I&#039;d have to check the town website to see who voted for what on an individual basis.  

But the BOS is not up for election this year, and the 4 BOE candidates have no contested elections, all the BOE candidates are guaranteed to win!   

The BOF is the race to watch.  And there are some clear choices, those on the record with no problem with higher taxes.  And those who have worked to keep tax increases down.

As far as &quot;unsportsmanlike&quot; play going on, I agree.  The Democrat flier was shameful, but expected based on their past history.  

I provided an analysis of the Democrat flier, perhaps you could provide a similar analysis on Republican claims?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality: Don&#8217;t confuse Ken with me.</p>
<p>I brought up the multi-year 4% raises in this comment thread.  The BOE and BOS are Democrat control boards.  I&#8217;d have to check the town website to see who voted for what on an individual basis.  </p>
<p>But the BOS is not up for election this year, and the 4 BOE candidates have no contested elections, all the BOE candidates are guaranteed to win!   </p>
<p>The BOF is the race to watch.  And there are some clear choices, those on the record with no problem with higher taxes.  And those who have worked to keep tax increases down.</p>
<p>As far as &#8220;unsportsmanlike&#8221; play going on, I agree.  The Democrat flier was shameful, but expected based on their past history.  </p>
<p>I provided an analysis of the Democrat flier, perhaps you could provide a similar analysis on Republican claims?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hjulstrom</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hjulstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Is this the pot calling the kettle Black? I do not see them as &quot;Imposter Signs&quot;. These signs carry a valid message that is based on documented votes by Lauren Cragg and statements made by Russ West that he would not have a problem paying more, which implies that he would not see a problem with every taxpayer paying more. You take this statement plus Lauren&#039;s voting record and what do you get....Higher Taxes! It&#039;s simple math.

By comparison, the DTC had no problem with their mischaracterization of the Republican candidates in last week&#039;s insert in the Rivereast. I can&#039;t wait to see what shows up in this week&#039;s paper! 

In addition, there has been extensive vandalism of Republican signs in the last couple of weeks and I have reports that someone was observed damaging signs at the North Main Street/Park Road interstection including a sign that was thrown into the brook. Other signs on North Main Street were run over by a car and others were taken from Jones Hollow Road. I would prefer not to report this to the State Police, so perhaps the DTC could reign in their supporters before they get in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the pot calling the kettle Black? I do not see them as &#8220;Imposter Signs&#8221;. These signs carry a valid message that is based on documented votes by Lauren Cragg and statements made by Russ West that he would not have a problem paying more, which implies that he would not see a problem with every taxpayer paying more. You take this statement plus Lauren&#8217;s voting record and what do you get&#8230;.Higher Taxes! It&#8217;s simple math.</p>
<p>By comparison, the DTC had no problem with their mischaracterization of the Republican candidates in last week&#8217;s insert in the Rivereast. I can&#8217;t wait to see what shows up in this week&#8217;s paper! </p>
<p>In addition, there has been extensive vandalism of Republican signs in the last couple of weeks and I have reports that someone was observed damaging signs at the North Main Street/Park Road interstection including a sign that was thrown into the brook. Other signs on North Main Street were run over by a car and others were taken from Jones Hollow Road. I would prefer not to report this to the State Police, so perhaps the DTC could reign in their supporters before they get in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Original Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Original Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-955</guid>
		<description>@ Ken - there have been petitions on important issues and projects submitted by residents within the past few years.  Which petitions are you saying are quetionable as to their validity?  The ones you didn&#039;t submit?

Are you saying that No Republicans voted for the BOE or Town raises?

You&#039;re staying uncharacteristically silent on the imposter Dem signs - what&#039;s your stance at RTC chair?   There&#039;s been some unsportsmanlike play going on ...we expect more in our town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ken &#8211; there have been petitions on important issues and projects submitted by residents within the past few years.  Which petitions are you saying are quetionable as to their validity?  The ones you didn&#8217;t submit?</p>
<p>Are you saying that No Republicans voted for the BOE or Town raises?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re staying uncharacteristically silent on the imposter Dem signs &#8211; what&#8217;s your stance at RTC chair?   There&#8217;s been some unsportsmanlike play going on &#8230;we expect more in our town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonjvalentine</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-954</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonjvalentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-954</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t just jump on a bandwagon of things said like,  becuase it was a democratic party in charge and not republican. 
I think it was voted in becuase of the mindset within the democratic party at that time, one that is also capable of existing in a republican party and vise versa.
Thanks for the clarification sort of. I do not understand the differences between your petition and the one they chose to invalidate. (probably why i am not in politics) you don;t have to go on explaining.
i don&#039;t know maybe I will vote for you.
I would say it seems you seem set on opposing Black (which may be a good thing in general) but you have to work WITH the other party also if you get in?
The crappy thing is if our economy worsens the money funding our government and our childrens education etc will be less, and eventualy cuts not wanted WILL have to be made. Not becuase of what party we have in charge, but many other extenuating circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t just jump on a bandwagon of things said like,  becuase it was a democratic party in charge and not republican.<br />
I think it was voted in becuase of the mindset within the democratic party at that time, one that is also capable of existing in a republican party and vise versa.<br />
Thanks for the clarification sort of. I do not understand the differences between your petition and the one they chose to invalidate. (probably why i am not in politics) you don;t have to go on explaining.<br />
i don&#8217;t know maybe I will vote for you.<br />
I would say it seems you seem set on opposing Black (which may be a good thing in general) but you have to work WITH the other party also if you get in?<br />
The crappy thing is if our economy worsens the money funding our government and our childrens education etc will be less, and eventualy cuts not wanted WILL have to be made. Not becuase of what party we have in charge, but many other extenuating circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hjulstrom</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hjulstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Oh, by the way, the Marlborough Board of Education was under Democratic leadership when the teacher contract was signed. Same goes for the Town employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, by the way, the Marlborough Board of Education was under Democratic leadership when the teacher contract was signed. Same goes for the Town employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Hjulstrom</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Hjulstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-952</guid>
		<description>I initiated a petition (to form a Charter Commisison)  that was solidly founded and was not contested. Most of the petitions to date have been questionable in regards to their validity. What I am saying is that this court decision, assuming it is as we have been told and that it is not appealed by the BOS, opens up a new area, which may lead to new types of petitions being considered valid.

I am not saying it is good or bad, only speculating on what might come out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initiated a petition (to form a Charter Commisison)  that was solidly founded and was not contested. Most of the petitions to date have been questionable in regards to their validity. What I am saying is that this court decision, assuming it is as we have been told and that it is not appealed by the BOS, opens up a new area, which may lead to new types of petitions being considered valid.</p>
<p>I am not saying it is good or bad, only speculating on what might come out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasonjvalentine</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-951</link>
		<dc:creator>jasonjvalentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-951</guid>
		<description>Jason said, “Do you have any idea how hard it is to petition?” 
Ken said ,
&quot;Well yes I do. I collected most of the 400 signatures to call for the last Charter Revision Commisison.&quot;
Jason asks,
So then in the past you felt you had the right to petition based on our already established rules. You then went on to say it makes you wonder now that a judge in Hartford is essentialy saying we have that right?  And then you gave some examples of people petitioning for sidewalks etc. 
Why would you wonder how it would be utilized now, if in the past you actualy utilized and exercised that right we all have always had the right to exercise?
It should be no different for you to wonder now that the judge essentialy said so?
Jason said, ” I THINK OUR OWN COMMON SENSE AND INTELLIGENCE will prevail duhh !”.
Ken said, &quot; Oh well, can’t argue with that. That statement speaks for itself.&quot;
Jason says, if it speaks for itself then why did you say something else?

My point is this I don&#039;t think we will be getting petiitions signed for projects like a business park with no businesses on it, to move roads, and then 5 years after move them again, or to gain funding for projects like cuttng down trees, digging up a town green and removing stone walls to replace them with stone walls, trees, a replanted town green, and to tear up a road to replace it with a road.
i don&#039;t think we will petition to hire an lawyer to fight a dissabled vetrans right to gain tax exempt status. When we could have just handed him the money the lawyer would have cost ! As gratitude for serving US, and being wounded in the process ! 
Do you wonder what will happen in a good way, or do you wonder if people will petition for non sense stuff? perhaps I missunderstoof you.
But I think our town hall is full of enough nonsense worth petitioning!
And I doubt the people will gather petitions let alone THE VOTES for every special interest category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason said, “Do you have any idea how hard it is to petition?”<br />
Ken said ,<br />
&#8220;Well yes I do. I collected most of the 400 signatures to call for the last Charter Revision Commisison.&#8221;<br />
Jason asks,<br />
So then in the past you felt you had the right to petition based on our already established rules. You then went on to say it makes you wonder now that a judge in Hartford is essentialy saying we have that right?  And then you gave some examples of people petitioning for sidewalks etc.<br />
Why would you wonder how it would be utilized now, if in the past you actualy utilized and exercised that right we all have always had the right to exercise?<br />
It should be no different for you to wonder now that the judge essentialy said so?<br />
Jason said, ” I THINK OUR OWN COMMON SENSE AND INTELLIGENCE will prevail duhh !”.<br />
Ken said, &#8221; Oh well, can’t argue with that. That statement speaks for itself.&#8221;<br />
Jason says, if it speaks for itself then why did you say something else?</p>
<p>My point is this I don&#8217;t think we will be getting petiitions signed for projects like a business park with no businesses on it, to move roads, and then 5 years after move them again, or to gain funding for projects like cuttng down trees, digging up a town green and removing stone walls to replace them with stone walls, trees, a replanted town green, and to tear up a road to replace it with a road.<br />
i don&#8217;t think we will petition to hire an lawyer to fight a dissabled vetrans right to gain tax exempt status. When we could have just handed him the money the lawyer would have cost ! As gratitude for serving US, and being wounded in the process !<br />
Do you wonder what will happen in a good way, or do you wonder if people will petition for non sense stuff? perhaps I missunderstoof you.<br />
But I think our town hall is full of enough nonsense worth petitioning!<br />
And I doubt the people will gather petitions let alone THE VOTES for every special interest category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Original Reality Check</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Original Reality Check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t see it on the Republican signs either.    BOF members don&#039;t have a vote or say on that contract ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t see it on the Republican signs either.    BOF members don&#8217;t have a vote or say on that contract &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marl06447</title>
		<link>http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/2009/10/26/judge-tells-marlborough-bos-to-not-take-action-on-hodge-case/comment-page-1/#comment-948</link>
		<dc:creator>Marl06447</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mainstreet-ct.com/marl/?p=716#comment-948</guid>
		<description>Oh,ONE thing that did change, all the teachers got 4% raises and will get another 4% raise next year and 4% next year and 4% next year.  

Oh, but that WAS not in the Democrat Flier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh,ONE thing that did change, all the teachers got 4% raises and will get another 4% raise next year and 4% next year and 4% next year.  </p>
<p>Oh, but that WAS not in the Democrat Flier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
